Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 80:18

מפני שיש ברובע שאין בנוגח ויש בנוגח שאין ברובע

[of the ox] causes a change [in its status], the opening clause [may also maintain that a change in the] control [of the ox] causes a change [in its status]. For the ruling in the opening clause could be based upon the reason that wherever the ox is put, it bears the name of its owner upon it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The ox therefore did not, by leaving the owner and coming into the hands of a borrower, undergo any change at all. ');">¹⁶</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 80:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.